Go Back   Acrostic Forums > General Discussion > General Discussion

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 11-21-2016, 02:03 PM
kerrym's Avatar
kerrym kerrym is offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2016
Posts: 6
Question I don't understand the scoring.

I'm sure this has been covered here before, so if someone can direct me to a link, I'd appreciate it. I've completed almost 300 acrostics here. I'm definitely not the smartest person here, but I'm not dumb.

At least, I didn't think so. How is it possible that I make major points on one puzzle where I am below average, but get minimal points on another when I am well above average?

It's as though the site creators set the points without checking out which acrostics were the easiest to solve.

And then never changed the metrics.
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 11-21-2016, 02:13 PM
hootmon's Avatar
hootmon hootmon is offline
Premium Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2013
Location: Atlanta, Ga
Posts: 8
Default

Points are awarded on elapsed time. There is no algorithm to take the difficulty into account. At least that is the way it seems to me. If you do the puzzle in under 150 seconds, you get 800 points. It goes down from there.
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 12-07-2016, 05:21 PM
kerrym's Avatar
kerrym kerrym is offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2016
Posts: 6
Default

Thanks for your help.
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 12-08-2016, 06:24 AM
genevoise's Avatar
genevoise genevoise is offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2015
Posts: 4
Question Scoring.

I would like to see an alternative scoring method. One that takes into count the difficulty of a puzzle. It wouldn't be difficult to create an algorithm to incorporate the average completion time, and percentage of correct solutions.

I'm not necessarily advocating changing the current scoring method, but rather having a second score, the weighted score.

What do people think?
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 12-08-2016, 06:53 AM
kerrym's Avatar
kerrym kerrym is offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2016
Posts: 6
Default The scoring system needs to be changed

I'd throw out the current scoring method. The time it takes to solve a puzzle has to be related to the difficulty, or else everyone will just choose to solve the short puzzles, as I have done for the last 8 days.

I'm currently #1, but it is a fake victory. It just means I figured out how to game the system.

I'm right-handed and my right hand is in a cast, but as long as I plug away (the surgeon is going to kill me) and hit F5 or refresh on my browser, I can just pick the <350 second puzzles and score major points.

I'd rather be #30 - or #90 - on a meaningful system than #1 on a system that doesn't make any sense.
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 12-08-2016, 09:22 AM
kerrym's Avatar
kerrym kerrym is offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2016
Posts: 6
Default Here's a quick fix

Quote:
Originally Posted by genevoise View Post
I would like to see an alternative scoring method. One that takes into count the difficulty of a puzzle. It wouldn't be difficult to create an algorithm to incorporate the average completion time, and percentage of correct solutions.

I'm not necessarily advocating changing the current scoring method, but rather having a second score, the weighted score.

What do people think?
I agree entirely that scores should be rated on where you are on the "fastest scorer" scale rather than just elapsed seconds. The current system is a farce.

If the host doesn't have the funds to do so, here's a quick fix for our host: every time you press refresh on your browser to get a quick puzzle, you forfeit a significant # of points. A "gimme" puzzle (one that has been solved in <300 seconds) is a sure 700+ point winner, but to find them you have to refresh your browser a lot and bypass the ones with the higher average times.

The scores and ratings would look radically different if everyone had to pay a penalty for refreshing their browser when a difficult puzzle appears. 100 pts per refresh? Very different.
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 12-09-2016, 09:04 AM
stewartp's Avatar
stewartp stewartp is offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2013
Posts: 11
Default

If any new system does not prevent players from posting bogus times, what's the point?
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 12-09-2016, 08:12 PM
DogMa's Avatar
DogMa DogMa is offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2012
Location: Virginia
Posts: 26
Default Just a typing contest

I stopped doing acrostics for a few months and have come back recently. It seems to me that the puzzles have become easier to solve, which, combined with the current scoring method, basically means it's the faster typists, not the most adept solvers, who achieve the highest scores.
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 12-10-2016, 06:55 AM
genevoise's Avatar
genevoise genevoise is offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2015
Posts: 4
Default

Easier? Drat, I thought I was improving.
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 12-19-2016, 06:49 PM
kerrym's Avatar
kerrym kerrym is offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2016
Posts: 6
Default Are the scores true?

Quote:
Originally Posted by stewartp View Post
If any new system does not prevent players from posting bogus times, what's the point?
Stewartp, do you have any basis for saying that? I used to compete in the ACPT, and there are people there who just blow my mind at how fast they can fill out a puzzle. For some reason, most are math or music majors - I've never figured that out.

I've seen your comments on several puzzles claiming that it's a fake record. Please be more explicit about why these are false records. Explain how they could have done it, because I just don't see how.
Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 04:12 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.7.0
Copyright ©2000 - 2017, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.

About Puzzle Baron

The Puzzle Baron family of web sites has served millions and millions of puzzle enthusiasts since its inception in 2006. From cryptograms to acrostics, logic puzzles to drop quotes, patchwords to wordtwist and even sudoku, we run the gamut in word puzzles, printable puzzles and logic games.